MCCA Reports Big Law Firms Make Diversity Strides Yet Disparities Still Persist | The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel
The Minority Corporate Counsel Association (MCCA) released its latest groundbreaking research report on the professional experiences of attorneys at Top 200 law ﬁrms, ﬁnding that while there have been commendable improvements to diversity programs in large law ﬁrms since its earlier studies done back in 2002 and 2003, “Big Law” has a long way to go before the legal profession becomes a true meritocracy. This research study, the ninth one conducted by MCCA, is titled Sustaining Pathways To Diversity: The Next Steps in Understanding and Increasing Diversity & Inclusion in Large Law Firms. Reporting on the views of more than 4,400 practicing attorneys from more than 120 of the nation’s top 200 most profitable law firms, MCCA’s research is the most comprehensive and credible study to date about the professional experiences of Big Law attorneys. Reﬂecting a broad sector of the legal profession, the respondents were diverse in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability status, age, experience, geographic location, and academic background. In fact, an outside statistician determined that the response rate gives MCCA’s survey a conﬁdence level of 99 percent, with a potential deviation of less than 2 percent for any one question. Top Tier credentials are less important to success than is ﬁtting within the majority culture. “MCCA’s research reveals that when it comes to one’s professional development, landing plum assignments and receiving satisfactory coaching/mentoring and feedback, whites enjoy a signiﬁcant advantage over all minorities, and this advantage persists whether one’s academic experience ranks as ‘Top Tier’ or ‘Third Tier,’” said Veta T. Richardson, executive director of MCCA. Some of the research highlights include: • Many minorities who attended Tier 1 law schools reported having less access to mentoring, coaching and sponsorship than did all white lawyers, without regard to what tier law school these white lawyers attended. • Whites who graduate from Tier 3 law schools are no less satisﬁed than their white peers who attended Tier 1 law schools, as 75 percent of all whites reported high levels of satisfaction with the coaching/mentoring and professional development that they receive in large law ﬁrms. • Only half of the minorities who attended Tier 1 law schools reported that evaluations of their work were free of assumptions and stereotypes based on background, while nearly three-quarters of all the white attorneys, without regard to what tier law school they attended, reported work evaluations as free of assumptions. • The group of lawyers who are most likely to consider law school grade point average and class rank less important when evaluating new hires is white females (associates and partners), with white male partners considering these factors most important in hiring deci
sions. This underscores that while men and women may have different views about what “qualiﬁed” means, the ﬁndings suggest that these credentials are not considered essential to determining which lawyers receive the professional development they need to be successful in large law ﬁrms. • Many white males reported feeling that the very programs intended to build more inclusive workplaces may be unfairly leaving them out. Several felt they were victims of “reverse discrimination” and as a result these lawyers tended to resent their ﬁrms’ diversity efforts. • Minorities and women reported lower satisfaction levels than white men regarding the work/life balance in their law ﬁrms. However, the perspectives shared by female associates were much closer to those of male associates than they were to female partners, illustrating that generational differences regarding work/life balance now appear to be more significant than gender differences, with younger male attorneys’ views aligning more closely with that of younger women attorneys. “We want to stress to law ﬁrms the importance of approaching diversity initiatives with sensitivity to ALL lawyers,” said Ms. Richardson, who was in charge of the general oversight and financial responsibility of this research project. “MCCAbelieves when diversity programs are successfully executed, all attorneys and their ﬁrms beneﬁt.” MCCA retained Dr. Arin N. Reeves of The Athens Group (www.athensgroup.net) to collaborate on this research and assist with all aspects of the project, including setting standards of research protocol, design of the survey questionnaire and instructions, determination of the research sampling, analysis of the survey ﬁndings, preparation of the written report, and development of the ﬁnal set of recommendations. In addition to Dr. Reeves, MCCA’s research team included Novations Group, Inc. which provided independent third-party data design, collection, consultation, and statistical analysis. The demographic distribution across respondents was as impressive as the response rate. Background on who was surveyed and who responded includes: • The survey was circulated to attorneys in 217 law ﬁrms, including all ﬁrms listed in the Am Law 200 list of top ﬁrms by revenue. All told, representatives from 124 different law ﬁrms responded. Nearly half of these ﬁrms had 10 percent or more attorneys responding. • There was a total response of 4,404 lawyers, which equates to roughly 4.17 percent of the total attorney population in the 217 ﬁrms. With this sample size, the ﬁnal results yielded a conﬁdence level of 99 percent, per MCCA’s independent statistician. • 49.3 percent of the respondents were partners, 40.7 percent associates, and 8.2 percent were counsel/of counsel. • 58.5 percent were male, and 41.5
percent were female. • 22.6 percent self-identified as racial/ethnic minorities, and 75.1 percent as white/Caucasian (non-Hispanic). • 4.9 percent self-identiﬁed as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. • 1.8 percent self-identiﬁed as a person with a disability. The Minority Corporate Counsel Association advocates for the expanded hiring, retention and promotion of minority attorneys in corporate legal departments and the law ﬁrms that serve them. Since its founding in 1997, MCCAhas emerged as the legal profes
sion’s knowledge leader on diversity issues, and its expanded platform offers solutions to diversity management challenges involving women, physically challenged, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers, in addition to attorneys of color (which remains its primary focus). MCCA advances its mission by publishing innovative research, illuminating diversity best practices, honoring diversity leadership with its prestigious Employer of Choice and Thomas L. Sager awards, and assisting diverse law students through the Lloyd M. Johnson, Jr. Scholarship Program.
Copyright (c) 2009 The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel